I thought that Montaigne's essay, "Of Thumbs", was a insightful narration of periods in history when the thumb held a different and unique function of holding and grasping weapons. It was also interesting to see how the rulers and leaders were so protective of their peoples thumbs for the purpose of defending the nation. Alice Meynell's essay on the other hand was very confusing and did not hold much significance to myself. I thought that the essay used a lot of metaphors and imagery that I didnt believe was necessary. I found this no more evident than in the sentence: "To live in constant efforts after an equal life, whether the equality be sought in mental production, or in spiritual sweetness, or in the joy of the senses, is to live without either rest or full activity." I think that this sentence is very confusing and has too many thoughts trying to be expressed at one time. Not only does this occur in this sentence but in many others just like it throughout the essay. I fear that others may have a problem understanding this as well. I also fear that my analysis of these two works do not posses the intellectual depth that is so desired among the scholars and students of such things. So I will I try to finish off this blog post with a thought: "Does a work gain power through longevity and thoughtfulness? I say nay, it comes through brevity and instinct."
42 minutes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I felt the same way you did after reading both of those essays. Meynell's essay was overcomplicated in my humble opinion but I still would have liked to have seen your attempt at copying one of the author's style more than just a few lines.
ReplyDeleteI also agree. I decided not to write on Meynell's essay because I didn't fully understand her complex sentences. I am not sure complex is the correct word; I should use the word burdened. There were so many ideas trying to be expressed all at once that the reader is burdened with the responsibility with trying to decipher everything. I enjoyed your finishing question because it was deep yet entertaining. Next time try to write more on the text and analyze more because I think you were doing a great time analyzing the essays.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Krissie. You have the beginning of a good analysis, but push harder. Be more specific. I'd like to know the whys and hows of your thoughts.
ReplyDelete